tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22424144.post889835904894909476..comments2023-11-02T04:18:45.711-07:00Comments on blogfish: The death of toxicologyMark Powellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08121566220326246265noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22424144.post-75087696161945498382007-08-10T14:26:00.000-07:002007-08-10T14:26:00.000-07:00....and then there are all of the interactions wit.......and then there are all of the interactions within that toxic soup, among all of those "too many chemicals" and "too complex toxicity pathways".Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22424144.post-52842375216700450492007-08-10T12:28:00.000-07:002007-08-10T12:28:00.000-07:00Thanks Revere. Those interested should check out ...Thanks Revere. Those interested should check out <A HREF="http://scienceblogs.com/effectmeasure/" REL="nofollow">Effect Measure</A>, Revere's interesting and insightful public health blog. Sadly, ocean and fish people now need to start worrying more about public health. <BR/><BR/>Now just who are these senior public health scientists and practitioners who run Effect Measure??Mark Powellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10333424116503463839noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22424144.post-22953823038571261422007-08-10T05:51:00.000-07:002007-08-10T05:51:00.000-07:00Couldn't agree more. Since I was one of the drafte...Couldn't agree more. Since I was one of the drafters of the US version of the Precautionary Principle at Wingspread, this has been a longstanding concern of mine, and several of my old friends and colleagues have been important contributors (Nick Ashford at MIT and Eula Bingham, who when she was OSHA Administrator tried to get a generic carcinogen rule that would eliminate chemical by chemical Reverehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07723038818835368803noreply@blogger.com