data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6eb15/6eb15f7aa8ee2071da0429643ccda0a5661562ac" alt=""
This is an interesting question on strategy, when is it smart to push for conservation, and when is it smart to settle for a compromise or partial solution? There is no definitive answer, but the author of this article makes an interesting case that anti-whaling activists pushed too hard on Japan to stop whaling.
When does strong conservation advocacy become counter-productive?
Of course, there is the opposite question, when is it good to stay strong, push hard, and hold out for a principle or a high goal?
To me, this is the toughtest question in conservation, and I wonder if readers can suggest useful case studies like this whaling analysis. Tweet
No comments:
Post a Comment