"Some folks made a killing depleting the Papahānaumokuākea Marine National Monument. Wait ‘til you see how much they’ll make not to fish there anymore."
So says the Honolulu Weekly, in a recent story.
I know some of the characters referred to in this story, the ones who made a pile of money to stop fishing. There is one thing that never changes in the story of fishing in Hawaii. A few people are doing really well, whether they're fishing or not.
The captains of industry get to be captains of fishery management in Hawaii. Jim Cook was the head of two fishing organizations, and also the head of the Fishery Management Council, the policy-making body that regulated his own fishing. When Jim Cook termed out of the management seat, his business partner Sean Martin took over. Neat. And most amazing of all, thanks to a special and unique legal exemption from conflict of interest law, Cook and Martin got paid a nice salary from the federal government for their time serving the public by managing themselves.
So I'm not surprised to see them getting a federal buyout. And they'll keep fishing anyway, just emphasizing a different fishery in a different place. It's not like they really had to quit fishing.
Sigh, I think I'm in the wrong line of work. Tweet
4 comments:
That's a mighty grim story. I like the way that you can be compensated $1.6M for a license you aren't even using, 55 times more than you are fined when you get caught fishing illegally SIX times. It's a nice piece of investigative reporting though, and good use of FoIA requests. Thanks for the post.
It's okay to fish. As long as you don't fish domesticated fish like goldfish. I love goldfish so I don't want people to hurt them...
For years we've been told that stakeholders should be involved in fisheries management processes. And people whose livelihoods depend on the health of the resource are definitely stakeholders. I understand what you are saying though. How SHOULD stakeholders be most appropriately involved in the process?
For years we've been told that stakeholders should be involved in fisheries management processes. And people whose livelihoods depend on the health of the resource are definitely stakeholders. I understand what you are saying though. How SHOULD stakeholders be most appropriately involved in the process?
Post a Comment